2+--+C.B.

Chris Bennett In "I want at wife" (1971) Judy Brady proves the vital role that women play in the household. Brady points out multiple examples of chores that woman do on a daily basis to make their husbands appreciate them. Brady wrote this to analyze the purpose of women in order for men to understand the lifestyle they live. This passage can be seen by not only women, but also men should realize how hard women work and women deserve to be thanked. Every year there are multiple threats made toward the United States people and government. Should the people giving these threats be held in jail without any reason? To what extent does this threat have to be for the person to be held in prison? Is there a different solution for dealing with these threats? I believe that in order to end further problems with this issue, our country should have the right to hold these people in prison until they can get to the bottom of it. Letting someone who could be a future threat to our society walk around in our streets is not an acceptable answer. If we are going to crack down on federal threats, we must contain each individual in jail without bail for as long as we need too. Although, this issue would be breaking basic civil rights of a human being, in order to fulfill peace within our government and country, a strict rule must be applied to assure happiness. If a civilian is held under some cloud of suspicion for whatever means, many times they will turn up guilty. If this case were to be about a non-citizen of our country, than why should we not have the authority to hold them in jail without trial? If peace, is our countries goal, it is not going to be just given with the society we live in. Rules must be enforced and actions need to be made in regards to threats toward our government. The worst situation that could possibly happen is a few weeks of hell for one person, but if that’s what needs to happen to ensure less threats and more peace towards our country, than we should take advantage of the opportunity. One prime example of this is in times of war or outbreak against government, we are taking many enemy combatants into custody. Being able to hold a trial for all of these people would be very hard plus what good overall would it solve. Individual rights must not be broken but it would almost be more valuable in some scenarios to break these rights than let their rights override national security. Terrorism can be another important example where we could take in multiple terrorists. One way to solve this issue is to make a compromise and solve each person case by case. If they have any prove of suspicion or criminal record, without any doubt should they be held in jail without trial. Other more complex cases that are harder to resolve, the victim should be freed but under surveillance at all times. Any victim that tries to flee the country should be held in jail and questioned for their actions. One question that could come up over this issue is that, if the government has to the right to overpower ones rights, could they continue to maintain that power in other areas like political or financial rights. In this case, the only reason rights are broken is to figure out the threat and if it is true and how to deal with the person responsible for the threat. Threats toward the government in my opinion are a much bigger deal than a political or financial violation. They need to be properly carried out and this could be the only way to end them permanently or at least be an attempt to fulfill our goal in peace.
 * Anticipation Guide for 1984 "people who are a serious threat to the government should be able to be held in prison without being charged"**

In this novel the audience could be a wide span of people but the main focus is toward people of post world war II in the western hemisphere. There was not even power between the communists and democrats which would further lead to tension between the two. Totalitarian played a big role in government for every individual and many were left wondering why the government has so much power. It also applies to people of our time in future to come because it shows us an alternative way of living under power and the effects that it may cause. It could be a way of understanding how to stand up for what you believe and not be pushed around.
 * Intended audience for __1984__ by George Orwell**

The main message portrayed in 1984 is that the government is way out of line. It could be looked at as a warning to our real life and that if we continue to live the way we are, we will eventually turn into the society of this novel. A totalitarian government is not a strong way for an individual to live and Orwell does a good job emphasizing this point to readers. In actual society, it would take a lot of moral losses in an individual to let its society turn into the one in this book. The purpose and the message in this novel are similar to me being that many feared that a totalitarian society will come true eventually. People may lose their freedom of speech, thoughts and feelings and these may be controlled by a single movement of society or government. Just like how the society in 1984 is portrayed as where the party monitors every actions and speech of the people and have control of the people physically and emotionally. The purpose ties in with the message in that Orwell would never want to see any of these situations occur and that such integrity in the book would lead people to think the same thing.
 * The Message for 1984 by George Orwell**
 * The purpose of 1984 by George Orwell**